Steve Langasek wrote: > Ok, can you provide an example to support this claim that sarge is worse? http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/status/release/oldstable http://security-tracker.debian.net/tracker/status/release/stable (You may want to grep for "high".) > I'm not saying that what the BTS shows in this view is at all accurate; I > think it's entirely possible that there are bugs missing here, since sarge's > release predates the advent of version tracking in the BTS The data above should be fairly accurate RE versions. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature