On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:13:32 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover said:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Has this been fixed in the latest incantation?
> > Please "fix" this by adding an additional mode/view, not replacing the
> > current one.
> Er, why? I have a working version that works on a package basis,
> not on a binary by binary basis, and it was a few lines of simple shell
> scripting. Also, if I recall correctly, the original script was in
> python. I don't do python.
Sorry, what I meant given that you were asking if that had been
"fixed" in that implementation, was that if that was to happen, the
current functionality be preserved and an additional view of the data
be added instead of replacing the current one. Not that you specifically
should fix it.