Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 16:13:24 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 1164730404.3336.176.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20061128000440.GA10225@mauritius.dodds.net>
References: <[🔎] 7f45d9390611271346v4dacbaf3n66a7b51465c7963b@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 200611272331.52815.debian@hendrik-sattler.de> <[🔎] 20061128000440.GA10225@mauritius.dodds.net>

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would normally recommend quilt, but I'm not sure it has a concept of
> conditional patches, which may make things awkward later if further
> patches are required. 

I've never used it but I think that what the "guards" feature of quilt
0.46 does. Unfortunately unstable only has 0.45.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Ektomorf - Outcast

	Horses are forbidden to eat fire hydrants in Marshalltown, Iowa.

Reply to:

References:
- Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch
  - From: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman@gmail.com>
- Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch
  - From: Hendrik Sattler <debian@hendrik-sattler.de>
- Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Mirror pulses now twice a day
Next by Date: Popularity-contest passes 20000 submitters
Previous by thread: Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch
Next by thread: Re: Conditionally applying an architecture-dependent patch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread