Re: cdrtools

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: cdrtools
From: Linas Žvirblis <0x0007@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 16:15:31 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 44DB3173.2030602@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 44DB28B8.nailJNV2WXRRP@burner>
References: <44CC7AEC.nailCEL111CCB@burner> <20060730200337.GD20140@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 44D0B79A.nailEF721QKA2@burner> <[🔎] 20060802233610.GB22160@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 44D5CCC9.nailGWM11O3E6@burner> <[🔎] 20060807080215.GA18585@country.grep.be> <[🔎] 44D70038.nailHDA1C0M6I@burner> <[🔎] 1154944372.8918.10.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr> <[🔎] 44D9E6D9.nailIIT2F3QVT@burner> <[🔎] 1155134576.6744.21.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 44DB28B8.nailJNV2WXRRP@burner>

Joerg Schilling wrote:

>>> The Debian project accepted the clauses in cdrecord ~ 4 years ago.
>> That doesn't mean the project still considers them acceptable *NOW*.
> So you like to tell me that Debian is not trustworthy?

The requirements of the project changed. That is called progress.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@debian.org>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Re: cdrtools
  - From: Joerg Schilling <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de>

Prev by Date: Re: cdrtools
Next by Date: Re: Silly Packaging Problem
Previous by thread: Re: cdrtools
Next by thread: Re: cdrtools
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread