Re: Buildds still not picking up new architectures, why?
On Thursday 27 July 2006 15:55, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:06:25PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
> > AFAICT Packages-arch-specific is a quinn-diff  conffile, so probably
> > bugreports should be filed against that package, but I'm not sure if
> > autobuilders actually use that package though. Also it seems like
> > dak/wanna-build/trigger.daily  should call quinn-diff to pick up new
> > entries from P-a-s, so not-picking new stuff should be filed against dak
> > package or quinn-diff package ? I don't know how lene/christina is
> > involved here. Hm, someone should really clarify these actually.
> Well, I do not think packages in the distribution are responsible for
> that situation. It is an infrastructure issue and the people holding
> the keys are always the same ones, with no time to do something about
> it and/or not willing to trust someone else to do the job. It is a
> dead end.
In fact these are two separate issues: a) why the infrastructure doesn't use
these packages; b) where to collect P-a-s calls for updates. I just read at
#128280, that these calls for updates are not wanted as wishlist bugs against
quinn-diff package, but I think that storing them in public media i.e. BTS is
far most robust solution (reveals when wishlists have been filed, and how
have been dealt with), than just posting them to someone's mailbox... but
anyway I'd tend to comply with the maintainer choice as said in the buglog.
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>
fingerprint 1AE7 7C66 0A26 5BFF DF22 5D55 1C57 0C89 0E4B D0AB