Re: [Debconf-discuss] list of valid documents for KSPs
On 28 May 2006, Thomas Bushnell verbalised:
> Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> I see you have never been in a large key signing party. There is a
>> certain expectation of trust, since no one can actrually detect
>> delibrate forgeries.
> Except that there was nothing forged about Martin's ID card, as it
> has been reported. It was exactly what it claimed to be, nothing
> more and nothing less.
>> If people start bringing in forged documents, no amount of caution
>> on part of laypeople like most software developers is proof against
>> such deception. If such deception is accepted behaviour, we may as
>> well throw out thetrust metric, and let /. upload packages into
> This may be true, except that *the document was not forged*.
So you continue to claim. And since you make statements like
this with no discernible means of you having verified them, I do not
see how discussion with you has any value whatsoever -- you'll make
any statements to back your position, whether or not you know them to
The happiest time of a person's life is after his first
divorce. J.K. Galbraith
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C