Il giorno 26/apr/06, alle ore 08:06, Wouter Verhelst ha scritto:
Would you really install unstable on your production machine?No, and this is exactly my point.Then I'm afraid I don't get your point. You're about to upload a separate squid3 package (to unstable) because you think people should continue to use squid 2.5 on production machines. I don't think people will install unstable on production machines, so don't see how that would be a problem.
Squid 3 is not release ready. And with current plans should not release with etch. So squid 2.5 needs to stay in unstable/testing at least until etch is released and can be installed on production machines.
A separated squid3 package allows those who want to test it on their unstable machine to do it easily.
Regards, -- Luigi Gangitano -- <luigi@debian.org> -- <gangitano@lugroma3.org> GPG: 1024D/924C0C26: 12F8 9C03 89D3 DB4A 9972 C24A F19B A618 924C 0C26