Luigi Gangitano wrote on 25/04/2006 01:32: > So I'm packaging Squid-3.0 from new sources (using CDBS for the first > time, great!). The resulting packages will be named 'squid3, squid3- > common, squid3-client, squid3-cgi' and will conflict with the > existing squid packages. Why do you conflict? Would squid3 require such big changes to make it installable side-by-side with the squid 2.5 packages? Wouldn't it make sense to allow as many people as possible to test it with their production squid (2.5) still available? Note that I do realize that you would need to revert any such changes once squid3 becomes stable (and a possible upgrade from 2.5). I'm just wondering wether the changes were so big that this is infeasible. Regrads, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature