On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 09:25:40AM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > Personally, I'd suggest: > > * for unmodified debs (including ones that have been rebuilt, possibly > > with different versions of libraries), keep the Maintainer: field the > > same > Joey Hess and others in this thread have said that this is not acceptable to > them. What I need from Debian is either a clear consensus resulting from > discussion among developers, Well, you're not going to get one when you're too busy telling us everything we suggest is wrong. All I can imagine you doing is encouraging people to even more firmly want nothing to do with Ubuntu. > or an official decision from a position of > authority. Otherwise, we'd just be chasing our tail trying to please > individuals with conflicting opinions. If you're trying to do the right and best thing, we've got something to talk about. But asking for "official decisions from a position of authority" looks more like a way of finding someone else for people to blame. Cheers, aj
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature