Re: Trivial bug on apt-file (Was : Re: Development standards for unstable)
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 01:07:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:00:41PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 07:31:17PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > and this answers IMHO what the maintainer wants a patch for: a system
> > > that would work with all download managers.
> > Which is something it is not going to work.
> Huh? What's so hard about that?
I meant to say that following the same reasoning, we can also claim that all
downloaders for X should be supported, since the end user might have a
preference to use them...
Anyway, my believe is that supporting those two as a baseline and then adding
support for more is not a problem, but should not stop us from having a sane
working option upon installation.
Jesus Climent info:www.pumuki.org
Unix SysAdm|Linux User #66350|Debian Developer|2.6.14|Helsinki Finland
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
It is not the size, mate. It's how you use it.
--N. Powers (Austin Powers in Goldmember)