Re: Development standards for unstable
* Thomas Viehmann (tv@beamnet.de) [060112 15:56]:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > I very much agree that we should strive to make packages as good as
> > possible, but if users depend on a package and there are no real
> > showstoppers in it, we might do our users a better service with shipping
> > than with not shipping the package.
> No. Shipping unsupported packages no developer cares about is a bad idea.
Well, by definition if a package is too broken to support it, the bug is
RC.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
Reply to: