Re: Development standards for unstable
Hi,
first of all, thanks for taking the initiative I think the matter is too
important to be left alone just for avoiding to step on anyones toes.
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Random ideas for negative consequences might include forced
> orphaning by overriding maintainer fields to debian-qa, removal of
Maybe this should not only be limited to packages with RC bugs... For a
lot of packages with inactive maintainers, it might be best to not
release them in etch.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Reply to: