also sprach Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> [2006.01.11.1644 +0100]:
> > Could you be more explicit? I know there has been concern about Ubuntu
> > amongst debian developers, and that Mark Shuttleworth has some doubts
> > about working with DCC, although he is rather vague in my opinion. But
> > what are the problems with Ubuntu? Is it an unecessary fork? Or is it
> > not contributing back its changes to debian software?
>
> I think it's the pretending that pisses people off.
IMHO, the border between contributing and employing people who also
work on Debian is not entirely clear.
How do you think Canonical could *better* work with Debian, ignoring
whether they meet up to their promises at the moment or not.
What would you like to see? And before you say: integrate stuff into
Debian directly, not into Ubuntu and then expect others to
backport, consider that we surely don't want everything in Debian
that the Canonical folks stuff into Ubuntu...
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"in diving to the bottom of pleasure
we bring up more gravel than pearls."
-- honoré de balzac
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)