[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run vs /var/run

On Dec 19, Roger Leigh <rleigh@whinlatter.ukfsn.org> wrote:

> >> If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
> >> for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay.
> > But it has no reason to go away either, since there are many other uses
> > too for a tmpfs.
> There are many uses for an ext3fs, but that doesn't mean we only have
> one ext3 filesystem.  What exactly is your reasoning here?
That tmpfs will not be removed from the kernel just because shm_open()
will switch to a different implementation.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: