[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run vs /var/run

On Dec 19, Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu> wrote:

> If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
> for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay.
But it has no reason to go away either, since there are many other uses
too for a tmpfs.

> > > /run doesn't especially /need/ to be a tmpfs fs does it?  It could
> It does not have much sense if it is not a tmpfs, since we already have
> /var/run.
I understand that some people want a writeable file system available
before / is mounted rw.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: