Re: /run vs /var/run
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Dec 19, Roger Leigh <email@example.com> wrote:
>> >> If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
>> >> for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay.
>> > But it has no reason to go away either, since there are many other uses
>> > too for a tmpfs.
>> There are many uses for an ext3fs, but that doesn't mean we only have
>> one ext3 filesystem. What exactly is your reasoning here?
> That tmpfs will not be removed from the kernel just because shm_open()
> will switch to a different implementation.
Of course. But if that happened there would be no reason to keep
/dev/shm mounted; you would need to use an alternate location.
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/
GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848. Please sign and encrypt your mail.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8+ <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----