Re: /run vs /var/run
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:14:45PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > But what about the future, and what about it being specifically for
> > POSIX-SHM?
> Tell us... Do you have reasons to believe that we will be forced to
> remove /dev/shm/ in the future?
If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay.
> > /run doesn't especially /need/ to be a tmpfs fs does it? It could
It does not have much sense if it is not a tmpfs, since we already have
/var/run.
Gabog
--
---------------------------------------------------------
MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
Hungarian Academy of Sciences
---------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: