[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /run vs /var/run

On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:14:45PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:

> > But what about the future, and what about it being specifically for
> Tell us... Do you have reasons to believe that we will be forced to
> remove /dev/shm/ in the future?

If in the future glibc decides to choose some other implementation
for shm_open(), then it has no reason to stay.

> > /run doesn't especially /need/ to be a tmpfs fs does it?  It could

It does not have much sense if it is not a tmpfs, since we already have


     MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Reply to: