arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:06:49 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>I'd love to see people migrating to Arch
Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: martin f krafft <madduck@debian.org>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs
- From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
- From: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <frankie@debian.org>