[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)

also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de> [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]:
> Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html

Looking over the list, I primarly note that it's about arch/tla.
When we speak about arch these days, we mean baz. And that takes
care of a lot of the concerns that Florian raises.

And while baz is also not perfect, it does at the very least serve
as a good lab for the development of bazaar-ng.

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"es ist immer etwas wahnsinn in der liebe.
 es ist aber auch immer etwas vernunft im wahnsinn."
                                                 - friedrich nietzsche

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: