Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 13:06:49 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
> <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> >I'd love to see people migrating to Arch
>
> Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
>
Comparing svn and arch is like comparing apples and tomatos. They have
completely different purposes (i.e. centralized vs distributed).
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Reply to: