Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:22:26PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
Note that it's over a year old, and seems to apply to tla 1.2. Many of the
issues are handled with tla 1.3 and baz, but of course, far from all.
I see the point of not turning this into an RCS flamewar, though :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
Reply to: