Re: runlevels remodeled
Scripsit Timo Aaltonen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> 2 multi-user, no network services exported, no NFS
> -more secure service-wise than 3
> -RH has network here, although they claim that 2 is not used
Given that it is very rare for machines these days to have banks of
local ttys attached, is a "multi-user without network" runlevel really
relevant for even a significant minory of our users? How would those
multiple users interact with the machine?
Or does it mean "single non-root user"?
Henning Makholm "Monarki, er ikke noget materielt ... Borger!"