On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 08:06:29PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:47:18PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > > And yes, I expect that all messages reported will need to be manually > > reviewed to avoid deleting good mails from the archive. > > It would be cool if we could create a spam-reporting alias similar to what > Spamcop does that would make it easy to report through e-mail (in Mutt > I have a shortcut to do just that). To prevent abuse, and to make it work in > a more semi-automatic way, maybe it could allow only GPG signed mails from > developers and work only if more than two developers reported the same > Message-ID. > > The problem with the web interface is that it lacks authentication, so you > cannot "trust me" more than you can trust average joe even though I've make > every effort to report only legitimate spam (something "average Joe" might > not do). If the spam reporting tool where to be developed through a mail > interface with GPG that would make automatic fixing of archives easier. > It could also allow reporting spam to the BTS easier too. > > Just my few cents. > I like. regards Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature