Re: Greylisting for @debian.org email, please

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net> writes:

> Robert Wolfe <robert@bufonline.dyndns.org> writes:
>
>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>>
>>>> Indeed, I have been sending my mail with UUCP since more than 10 years
>>>> and I am not going to stop soon.
>>>
>>> That's fine.  What people are asking for is best effort delivery, and
>>> eventual delivery of all valid messages.  Your proposal (and your
>>> practice?) violate both of those.
>>
>> Clarify.
>>
>> As long as the email gets out via UUCP and comes in via UUCP without
>> problems, I do not see HOW his practice and proposal violate "best
>> effort delivery."  Then again, it would seem that not everyone has the
>> same definition of "best effort," now would they?
>
> Where I said "that's fine" I meant that his practice is fine, because
> it's best effort (for that protocol).

To clarify, Marco's use of UUCP is fine; his blocking of valid email
for illegitimate reasons is not.  Especially since his reason is "you
should pay so that I don't have to."