* Tollef Fog Heen (tfheen@err.no) wrote: > * Eric Dorland > > | BTW, any Ubuntu developers care to comment? I'm interested in second > | opinions and how you guys are handling this situation? Did you accept > | an arrangement with MoFo? > > We've been in touch with them and have currently renamed the > mozilla-firefox package to firefox. The same thing is going to happen > to mozilla-thunderbird once I get around to it. We are unsure about > the downstream namechange requirement, but not having firefox in there > would be bad. So, a bit undecided at the moment. Thanks for answering. We may end up having to do the mozilla-firefox -> firefox rename too if we keep the name too. Is Ubuntu concerned about MoFo's trademark policy? Did Ubuntu make a similar arrangement with MoFo that we're being offered? As an aside (I should probably just look) but are you guys using their official logo? > I wonder if we (as in Debian) could get the Mozilla Foundation to > agree that in addition to the terms provided earlier in this thread > our downstreams get an automatic trademark licence (a Community > Edition Licence) which can be revoked if they misrepresent or > misbehave. Given that the Mozilla Foundation are fairly happy with > the quality we are providing and most downstreams would inherit that > quality this could be acceptable to them. > -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature