* Wouter Verhelst (wouter@debian.org) wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 12:23:19PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > The MoFo has made no statement that they would grant a trademark > > license to anyone would adhered to the same standards as Debian. If > > this were true (and hopefully in writing), I think things would be > > much less problematic. > > Well, that's something to work with. Have they been asked whether they > would be willing to make such a statement? Yes, I think I outlined this in a previous email, but I asked them this in January and Gervase said they wouldn't do this because it was too hard to define what high quality was. -- Eric Dorland <eric.dorland@mail.mcgill.ca> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature