On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:22:20AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I noticed that Adrian moved a bug report for a kernel in sid (2.6.10 > > IIRC) to the 2.6.8 kernel so it appeared as a Sarge RC Bug? I didn't > > see anything that showed that it was a 2.6.8 problem, maybe it is, but > > it looked like second guessing to me... > The important part of the bug log is the following by one of the Debian > kernel maintainers: > well reiserfs doesn't work well with preempt, > could you please try the 2.6.11 kernel-iamge. > there preempt is disabled afair. > PREEMPT is enabled in both the 2.6.8 and the 2.6.10 kernel images but no > longer in the 2.6.11 kernel images. > It might look like second guessing, but if ReiserFS has problems with > PREEMPT in 2.6.10, the probability that this is also present in 2.6.8 is > quite high. > > How is this helping Sarge? If it turns out that it does affect part > > of Sarge then isn't there a means provided to upload the new .deb > > files after release? > The main question is not when and how to fix such an issue. > The problem is that the release team's scripts to measure their RC bugs > metric can't handle pseudo-packages correctly. > Steve has already acknowledged this limitation (and AFAIK it has yet > to be fixed). > Therefore my reassigning was required to get this bug on the radar of > the release team. Actually, I've started using lynx -width=160 -dump http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/other/all.html \ | grep -v '\[[EUS]*X*\]\|I\]\|\[TX\]' | grep -B3 '\[........\]' as a means of tracking the status of sarge-affecting RC bugs according to bugs.debian.org. The diff between this and bts.turmzimmer.net includes two bugs against packages that are only in non-US; two bugs against installation-reports which most likely need to be downgraded; one upgrade-reports bug which is probably unreproducible; one bug on 'kernel' that is probably sarge-ignore but I haven't looked at it in any detail yet; one unreproducible bug against "general" which is probably a fixed bug in an old package; and one RC bug against ftp.debian.org asking for d-i udeb packages to be synced for the release (95% resolved as far as the release is concerned, current overall status seen at <http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/d-i/sarge-sarge.txt>). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature