On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:02:44PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: >What license issue do you mean? The fact that it's "GPLv2 exactly, >unless Linus wants a later GPL"? I'm not lawyerly enough to see why >that's a problem. On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:57:56PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >The package is GPLed, but depends on OpenSSL, whose license is not >GPL-compatible. Please ask upstream for a linking exception, or use >some other SHA-1 implementation. Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://debian.org/ `- http://v7w.com/anibal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature