Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture
* Adrian Bunk (bunk@stusta.de) [050424 00:30]:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> > > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
> >
> > Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to
> > provide security updates for arm, even in woody, is there any point in
> > including it in sarge when we could include an architecture with working
> > autobuilders just in place?
> >
> > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2005/04/msg00183.html
> Could anyone explain the story behind this?
>
> Why exactly is there no longer an ARM autobuilder?
Because the previous autobuilders had hardware crashes (as in "don't
boot anymore"). We have already new autobuilders up and running, and
hopefully stable-security is added soon.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
Reply to: