[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture

I demand that Bernd Eckenfels may or may not have written...

> In article <[🔎] 20050423202040.GA25852@mauritius.dodds.net> you wrote:
>> We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with
>> our mirrors

> We dont need to have all architectures on all mirrors. And for the
> less-often used architectures we event dont need to care, since one or two
> mirrors can easyly hold a stable archive and serve it.

Two or three, with sufficient geographical separation?

| Darren Salt   | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at
| sarge,        | Northumberland | youmustbejoking
| RISC OS       | Toon Army      | demon co uk
|   We've got Shearer, you haven't

Quantised Revision of Murphy's Law: Everything goes wrong all at once.

Reply to: