Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture
I demand that Bernd Eckenfels may or may not have written...
> In article <[🔎] 20050423202040.GA25852@mauritius.dodds.net> you wrote:
>> We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with
>> our mirrors
> We dont need to have all architectures on all mirrors. And for the
> less-often used architectures we event dont need to care, since one or two
> mirrors can easyly hold a stable archive and serve it.
Two or three, with sufficient geographical separation?
--
| Darren Salt | nr. Ashington, | linux (or ds) at
| sarge, | Northumberland | youmustbejoking
| RISC OS | Toon Army | demon co uk
| We've got Shearer, you haven't
Quantised Revision of Murphy's Law: Everything goes wrong all at once.
Reply to: