Re: Status of 'sarge' for the amd64 architecture
On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:12:42AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 23 avril 2005 à 13:20 -0700, Steve Langasek a écrit :
> > We are already running into size constraints (on an ongoing basis) with our
> > mirrors due to the size of the archive.
>
> Given that - if I believe the security team [1] - we are not able to
> provide security updates for arm, even in woody, is there any point in
> including it in sarge when we could include an architecture with working
> autobuilders just in place?
>
> [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2005/04/msg00183.html
Could anyone explain the story behind this?
Why exactly is there no longer an ARM autobuilder?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Reply to: