[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

Hi, Henning Makholm wrote:

> Yes, but the fact stands that the particular plan we're discussing
> does not allow them.
If the plan is set in stone there's no(t much) need for discussion.

> How do you propose that the plan can be made useful without pointing
> out its flaws?

I am not Steve, but ...
... by describing improvements? Which is what we're doing. We KNOW that
the original plan doesn't have the changes we're talking about. I don't
know how often you've told us, but I think it's been often enough. ;-) 

Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@smurf.noris.de

Reply to: