On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:05:20PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In the contrary I assume that currently the security mechanism for > alls archs is hindered by the fact that the slowest arch sets the pace. > There has been a XSF-SVN commit for the latest libxpm vulnerability some > days ago, which hasn't culminated into a DSA yet. How long does an > xfree86 build take on arm, mips or m68k? Which is why I proposed elsewhere that the standard be set as something like "must be able to build packages in no more than 150% [or other reasonable figure] of the time taken by the most popconular arch". Let the porters for an arch work out how they want to satisfy the criteria (cross-compilation, distcc, magic beans), as long as they meet it. - Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature