[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

Scripsit Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:

>> Building stable once it is released does look indeed like a good
>> option.  Only it's a pity that the Vancouver plan does not allow it.

> There are lots of things not "allowed" by the plan that are possible
> nevertheless.

Yes, but the fact stands that the particular plan we're discussing
does not allow them.

> Let's focus on making the plan useful, rather than treating it as a
> final pronouncement, shall we?

How do you propose that the plan can be made useful without pointing
out its flaws?

Henning Makholm                         "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"

Reply to: