Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
Scripsit Steve Langasek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> Building stable once it is released does look indeed like a good
>> option. Only it's a pity that the Vancouver plan does not allow it.
> There are lots of things not "allowed" by the plan that are possible
Yes, but the fact stands that the particular plan we're discussing
does not allow them.
> Let's focus on making the plan useful, rather than treating it as a
> final pronouncement, shall we?
How do you propose that the plan can be made useful without pointing
out its flaws?
Henning Makholm "Al lykken er i ét ord: Overvægtig!"