Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting
David Nusinow <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I'm pretty amazed that people are saying that without being an FCC that their
> arch will simply die. I don't understand why the porters, who've been so quick
> to point out that they'll host and maintain buildd's, aren't willing to simply
> track unstable and set up their own buildd network for their port. The m68k
> guys did it. So did amd64. dak is now in the archive, and sbuild has been there
> for ages. Quite frankly, I'll be shocked if m68k or anyone else doesn't make
> their own etch release within days of the official one.
Just that this wouldn't be a "Debian release", just something random,
derived from Debian etch.
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich