[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

Matthias Urlichs wrote:

With a decent toolset, doing a security package for 10 architectures
should be a nearly-constant amount of work, no matter which base the
number 10 is written in.

Speaking of which, can anyone here explain to me why does a two-line security fix on, say, KDE, makes things need to be recompiled for 12 days long? (!!!) One could think that there are more incremental ways of dealing with recompilation of enourmous packages.


Reply to: