[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debianized ndiswrapper-source is better on SourceForge

On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 11:06 -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:00:18AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > That's still no reason to rip the d-d.
> I didn't rip it.  I said I'm not griping -- just remarked on
> the fact that the upstream is already Debianized and is not
> broken.
> I don't think the maintainer even uses ndiswrapper on his
> system.  He's just trying to shove module-assistant down
> everybody's throat because "it's like everything else."
> Y'all are already going to make a bunch of obnoxious
> comments, might as well crank you to 11.

"shove ... down everybody's throat"
"You've F'd it up beyond all recognition"

You know the expression about vinegar and honey, right?

Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail.

Alles touristen und non-technischen looken peepers! Das
machinkontrol is nicht for gefengerpoken und mittengrabben.
Oderwise is easy schnappen der springenverk, blowenfus,
undpoppencorken mit spitzensparken. Der machine is diggen by
experten only. Is nicht fur geverken by das dumpkopfen. Das
rubber necken sightseenen keepen das cotton-picken hands in das
pockets. So relaxen, und vatchen das blinkenlights.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: