On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:40:06AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:14:09PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > No, he said "you need to replace them". > > > > > > He also said "cannot". > > > > If they can't put up a few buildd's, I'd hardly call that grounds for > > replacement. We have more pressing issues than setting up buildd's (like > > the security of our systems). And if they don't have the time to do that > > (currently, so consider that their time constraints may change), what > > makes anyone think they'll have time to train someone in doing the > > buildd setups? > > Debian is still having security problems 3 months after breakin? If so > that would also indicate a major problem with getting work done that > probably needs more hands... It is not a case of training people how > to setup buildds, it is a case of giving people access to w-b. Notice > in the Ingo's email they are giving some people w-b access in 1 day > but are ignoring others permanently. That's not true. It's taking a lot of time, but if I hadn't made the error of encrypting to the wrong key, all setup that had been asked for would have been done now. > So it DEFINITELY is not a case of them being overloaded. I don't see what else it could be. -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation." "So is my neck, stop it anyway!" -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature