Re: Debian needs more buildds. It has offers. They aren't being accepted.
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:27:23AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:46:52AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> This has been going on for a long time. Apparently everything is
> >> bottlenecked either by Ryan Murray or by James Troup. Ingo Juergensmann
> >> <ij@spice.cologne.de> can provide plenty of information.
>
> >> This is really an unacceptable situation.
>
> >> I'm asking you, the DPL, to do something about it. If the current delegates
> >> cannot or will not do what they need to do, *you* need to replace them.
>
> > For sure James and Ryan are way too idle and don't have enough work, and
> > I'm sure they are easily replaceable. Their job is cake work, and any
> > idiot could do it.
> [...]
>
> This is completely beside the point. Nathanel was not claiming that
> James and Ryan don't have enough work, but that they do have more work
> than they can handle and should outsorce some of it by e.g. allowing
> the installation of a second mipsel buildd.
No, he said "you need to replace them".
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
WatchGuard - http://www.watchguard.com/
Reply to: