Re: Linux Core Consortium
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:05:00AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op do, 16-12-2004 te 17:07 -0800, schreef Adam McKenna:
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:13:11AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > I think Wouter is only asking for reciprocity here. If they don't care
> > > about his concerns why should he care about theirs ? Or alternatively
> > > "not caring" is a freedom.
> > We care because our priorities are our users and free software. Just because
> > someone works for an ISV or develops on/for proprietary software does not
> > make them a second class user.
> > That said, I am not arguing for or against LCC, I just didn't like the tone
> > of Wouter's e-mail, or the sentiment implied in it.
> I did not intend that sentiment; I explained what I meant to say in a
> new thread.
I apologize for misinterpreting your sentiment.
Adam McKenna <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>