[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Linux Core Consortium

On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 02:36:52PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> >But overriding them means we lose the certification ? 
> > 
> >
> We can't allow it to be the case that overriding due to an existing and 
> unremedied security issue causes loss of certification. There's no 
> common sense in that.

Then could you elaborate the scope of the certification ? It is one
of the main contender for me. I though the certification require to
ship the exact same binary as provided by the LCC.

Adding support for SE Linux (for example, I am not pushing SE Linux)
can imply rebuild some softwares with configure --with-selinux and link
them with libselinux.so. They certainly won't be identical to the LLC

Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here. 

Reply to: