[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Linux Core Consortium

Op do, 16-12-2004 te 17:07 -0800, schreef Adam McKenna:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:13:11AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > I think Wouter is only asking for reciprocity here. If they don't care
> > about his concerns why should he care about theirs ? Or alternatively
> > "not caring" is a freedom.
> We care because our priorities are our users and free software.  Just because
> someone works for an ISV or develops on/for proprietary software does not 
> make them a second class user.
> That said, I am not arguing for or against LCC, I just didn't like the tone
> of Wouter's e-mail, or the sentiment implied in it.

I did not intend that sentiment; I explained what I meant to say in a
new thread.

     smog  |   bricks
 AIR  --  mud  -- FIRE
soda water |   tequila
 -- with thanks to fortune

Reply to: