[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:36, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:23:21 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org> said: 
> > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:55, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> And how do we find who we are alienating? Oh, I know: lets have a
> >> GR.
> > Don't put words in my mouth. I hate GRs.
> 	That, unfortunately, may be the only recourse you have, if
>  this thing ever gets packaged.

You seem to be under the false impression I am vehemently against
packaging hot-babe.

In reality, I only wanted people to consider the legal (rather than
ethical) consequences. Early in the thread the conversation was veering
off in stupid directions about whether or not it was sexist or whether
or not we want 13 year olds seeing it; I wanted to get it off of that.

Since it seems that at least some people (such as yourself) have
considered it as a legal issue and think it not a problem, I am fine
supporting its entry into main, as I have stated elsewhere in this
thread. I am open to a common sense resolution of the issue -- provided
people are actually addressing the issue (which the vast majority of
participates in this thread are not).

This will be my last post on this topic; it's wasted too much of
everyone's time already.
Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: