[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:01:08 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org> said: 

> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 13:26, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> perhaps to bring down the conversation to something more
>> constructive, I think we should base decision to have something or
>> not in Debian:
>> 1. _NOT_ on personal belief (else we would probably end with
>>    nothing).

> Agreed.

>> 2. _NOT_ on local laws (same comment).

> Disagreed. If Debian is illegal to distribute to some important
> section of people in the world, because we include strange
> noncritical bits of software (hotbabe, the bible), then we have a
> real problem.

	In that portion of the world, sure. DSebian should continue to
 practice freedom, and hope that those portions of the world get
 better in time.

>> 4. does it respect basic democratic values?

	Please demonstrate how vi respects basic democratic values.

>> 5. does it respect other people's belief and personallity?

	vi does not respect my belief or personality.


Lack of skill dictates economy of style. Joey Ramone
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Reply to: