Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
- From: Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:42:37 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Mail-followup-to: email@example.com
- In-reply-to: <1101844867.20019.11.camel@localhost> (Joe Wreschnig's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:01:08 -0600")
- References: <E1CYuzu-0001fP-00@Tatooine.r3z0> <20041130143338.GA10337@excelhustler.com> <20041130145235.GA13059@nic.fr> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <41ACC966.email@example.com> <1101844867.20019.11.camel@localhost>
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:01:08 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 13:26, Eric Lavarde wrote:
>> Hi again,
>> perhaps to bring down the conversation to something more
>> constructive, I think we should base decision to have something or
>> not in Debian:
>> 1. _NOT_ on personal belief (else we would probably end with
>> 2. _NOT_ on local laws (same comment).
> Disagreed. If Debian is illegal to distribute to some important
> section of people in the world, because we include strange
> noncritical bits of software (hotbabe, the bible), then we have a
> real problem.
In that portion of the world, sure. DSebian should continue to
practice freedom, and hope that those portions of the world get
better in time.
>> 4. does it respect basic democratic values?
Please demonstrate how vi respects basic democratic values.
>> 5. does it respect other people's belief and personallity?
vi does not respect my belief or personality.
Lack of skill dictates economy of style. Joey Ramone
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C