On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 16:07 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 20:35:04 -0600, Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> said: > > > On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 21:23 -0500, David Nusinow wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 08:51:55PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > >> > I'm not sure, how »pornography« is defined in the US and I really > >> > didn't intend to join your nice discussion, but could you please > >> > keep in mind, that it just show rough pixely pictures of a drawn > >> > woman? > >> > >> The problem with pornography in the US is that it isn't > >> defined. It's officially "I'll know it when I see it." Tread > >> carefully. > > > Add to that, "contributing to the delinquency of a minor" if the > > disk gets in the hand of a juvenile (the younger the "better") and > > the prosecutor is up for re-election or has further political > > political ambitions. > > Same goes for gampling software, As I mentioned in another post, gambling requires money. AFAICT, no games in Debian *require* money. Thus, no gambling. > and violent games. Or, in > some locales, anything that promotes free speech or religion. "anything that promotes free speech" is pretty vague, but, for example, the PRC might not allow crypto s/w. Thus, maybe non-US may need to be renamed non-PRC? As for violent games & religion, the question *does* need to be asked: how far will D-Ds bend their mostly libertarian/Leftist views in order to ensure that Debian *disks* can be possessed in as much of the world as possible? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. Spit in one hand, and wish for peace in the other. Guess which is more effective...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part