Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor
Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 02:13:25AM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 01:36, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:23:21 -0600, Joe Wreschnig <email@example.com> said:
> > > On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 17:55, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > >> And how do we find who we are alienating? Oh, I know: lets have a
> > >> GR.
> > > Don't put words in my mouth. I hate GRs.
> > That, unfortunately, may be the only recourse you have, if
> > this thing ever gets packaged.
> You seem to be under the false impression I am vehemently against
> packaging hot-babe.
> In reality, I only wanted people to consider the legal (rather than
> ethical) consequences. Early in the thread the conversation was veering
> off in stupid directions about whether or not it was sexist or whether
> or not we want 13 year olds seeing it; I wanted to get it off of that.
> Since it seems that at least some people (such as yourself) have
> considered it as a legal issue and think it not a problem, I am fine
> supporting its entry into main, as I have stated elsewhere in this
> thread. I am open to a common sense resolution of the issue -- provided
> people are actually addressing the issue (which the vast majority of
> participates in this thread are not).
> This will be my last post on this topic; it's wasted too much of
> everyone's time already.
The only thing this thread has succeeded in doing for me is:
a) making me go download, compile and run it
b) adjust the threshold so I have to work for my reward
c) thinking, wow, this is cool, i wish it was debianized
so i didn't have to do step a