Re: The Line (was Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor)
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 12:12 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Ron Johnson (ron.l.johnson@cox.net) wrote:
> > Did anyone say that anarchism should be taken out of main? No.
> >
> > What I said, and meant, was, "The line was crossed when Ed Boraas
> > (?) put anarchism into main." That's all, nothing more.
>
> Perhaps I wasn't clear then. The 'line' is in a different place for me
> and I don't feel it was crossed wrt the Anarchism FAQ.
'hot-babe' shouldn't also cross the line, since, as you said, it is only
a rhetorician excuse to say it could offend straights. Shouldn't this
also be, probably, an excuse to offend straights bringing 'hot-babe' to
main?
I don't see any real excuse why both shouldn't be within main. Isn't it
DFSG compatible?
Regards,
--
David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> | http://www.damog.net/
GPG: 356E16CD - 84F0 E180 8AF6 E8D0 842F B520 63F3 08DB 356E 16CD
What the fuck is 'WTF'?
Reply to: