On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 21:38 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > * William Ballard (nospam_40811@alltel.net) wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 12:31:57AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > > Of course, if you can be shocked by nudity, don't use it! > > > > I don't think things like this belong in the main distribution. > > It's funny and all, but it sets a bad precedent and will scare > > the straights. > > It's actually an interesting question- where does Debian draw the line? > An interesting counter-point is the language used in Linux. > Personally, I think the language in Linux is fine while I don't think > it'd be good to have 'hot-babe' in Debian. Following along that, I > don't think it'd be good to have explicit stories in a Debian package > either. The line was crossed when Ed Boraas (?) put anarchism into main. At least hot-babe has *something* to do with computers (being a system activity monitor). The Anarchist FAQ is nothing but politics. And not "historical politics" like the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, etc. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B I prefer encrypted mail. "Revolution is not a dinner party, not an essay, nor a painting, nor a piece of embroidery; it cannot be advanced softly, gradually, carefully, considerately, respectfully, politely, plainly, and modestly. Mao Zedong
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part