[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

* William Ballard (nospam_40811@alltel.net) wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 12:31:57AM +0100, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
> >   Of course, if you can be shocked by nudity, don't use it!
> I don't think things like this belong in the main distribution.
> It's funny and all, but it sets a bad precedent and will scare
> the straights.

It's actually an interesting question- where does Debian draw the line?
An interesting counter-point is the language used in Linux.
Personally, I think the language in Linux is fine while I don't think
it'd be good to have 'hot-babe' in Debian.  Following along that, I
don't think it'd be good to have explicit stories in a Debian package

Perhaps if someone can come up with a good policy document that we DDs
can agree to we can have something to point ours users to who want these
packages as well as those who would do ITP's for such.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: