Re: Intent to mass-file bugs: FDL/incorrect copyright files
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:39:17 -0800, Brian Nelson <pyro@debian.org> said:
>
>> I disagree. It is not clear to me these would suddenly become bugs
>> after sarge's release.
>
> I am not sure how I can help with that. However, no one seems
> to be arguing that the GFDL meets the requirements of the DFSG. The
> SC shal require everything in main to do so post sarge. Ergo, any
> material in main that does not meet the DFSG needs be removed --
> which seems to be a working definition of a release critical bug
> (release critical for etch).
But the changes to the SC were "editorial", and the consensus seems to
be that everything in Debian is "software" anyway, so why doesn't the
current SC mean exactly the same as the new one?
--
For every sprinkle I find, I shall kill you!
Reply to: